Chlorophyll content estimation in oregano leaves using a portable Chlorophyll meter : relationship with Mesophyll thickness and leaf age
Keywords:
origanum vulgare, CCM 200 plus, thickness index, spongy parenchymaAbstract
Chlorophyll meter CCM 200 plus capacity to estimate total leaf chlorophyll content (Chl) in Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum was evaluated. This study aimed to elaborate a calibration model adapted to the species and evaluate the effect of mesophyll thickness and leaf age on the readings. This research included a wide range of chlorophyll concentrations, mesophyll thicknesses and leaves from different layers within the plant. Thus good estimates of total chlorophyll content were obtained with this meter, although it was less accurate in mature leaves, which have higher values of chlorophyll content and mesophyll thickness. As mesophyll thickness increases, spongy parenchyma develops more than other anatomical structures, modifying the leaf optical properties and increasing the variability of the readings. The best fit was obtained with a logistic equation [Chl=0.343/(1+1.925(-0.069x))], adapted to a broad data ranges and any leaf typology, according to ontogenetic age and position in the plant.Downloads
References
Arunyanark, A.; S. Jogloy; C. Akkasaeng; N. Vorasoot; T. Kesmala; R.C. Nageswara Rao; G.C. Wright and A. Patanothai. 2008. Chlorophyll stability is an indicator of drought tolerance in peanut. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 194: 113-125.
Bosabalidis, A.M. 2002. Structural features of Origanum sp. In: S.E. Kintzios, ed. Oregano, v. 25. (In: R. Hardman, ed. Medicinal and aromatic plants - Industrial profiles). Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York. 21-25.
Castelli, F.; R. Contillo and F. Miceli. 1996. Non-destructive determination of leaf chlorophyll content in four crop species. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 177: 275-283.
Castro, K.L. and A. Sanchez-Azofeifa. 2008. Changes in spectral properties, chlorophyll content and internal mesophyll structure of senescing Populus balsamifera and Populus tremuloides leaves. Sensors 8: 51-69.
D’Ambrogio de Argüeso, A. 1986. Manual de técnicas en histología vegetal. Editorial Hemisferio Sur, Buenos Aires. 83 p.
Davidenco, V.; C. Vega and J. Argüello. 2012. Respuesta fotoperiódica en Origanum vulgare ssp. vulgare y ssp. hirtum Ietsw.: impacto sobre su desarrollo y crecimiento. Rev. FCA UNCUYO 44(1): 1-12.
Di Rienzo, J.A.; F. Casanoves; M.G. Balzarini; L. Gonzalez; M. Tablada and C.W. Robledo. 2011. InfoStat, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba.
Dwyer, L.M.; M. Tollenaar and L. Houwing. 1991. A nondestructive method to monitor leaf greenness in corn. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71: 505-509.
Gáborcik, N. 2003. Relationship between contents of chlorophyll (a+b) (SPAD values) and nitrogen of some temperate grasses. Photosynthetica 41(2): 285-287.
Gausman, H.W.; W.A. Allen; D.E. Escobar; R.R. Rodriguez and R. Cardenas. 1971. Age effects of cotton leaves on light reflectance, transmittance, and absorptance and on water content and thickness. Agronomy Journal 63: 465-469.
Gönüz, A. and B. Özörgücü. 1999. An investigation on the morphology, anatomy and ecology of Origanum onites L. Turk. J. Bot. 23: 19-32.
Jifon, J.L.; J.P. Syvertsen and E. Whaley. 2005. Growth environment and leaf anatomy affect non-destructive estimates of chlorophyll and nitrogen in Citrus sp. leaves. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 130(2): 152-158.
Loh, F.C.W.; J.C. Grabosky and N.L. Bassuk. 2002. Using the SPAD 502 meter to assess chlorophyll and nitrogen content of benjamin fig and cottonwood leaves. HortTechnology 12: 682-686.
Markwell, J.; J.C. Osterman and J.L. Mitchell. 1995. Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter. Photosynth. Res. 46: 467-472.
Monje, O.A. and B. Bugbee. 1992. Inherent limitations of non-destructive chlorophyll meters: a comparison of two types of meters. HortScience 27(1): 69-71.
Nielsen, D.; E.J. Hogue; G.H. Neilsen and P. Parchomchuket. 1995. Using SPAD-502 values to assess the nitrogen status of apple trees. HortScience 30(3): 508-512.
Richardson, A.D.; S.P. Duigan and G.P. Berlyn. 2002. An evaluation of non-invasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content. New Phytol. 153: 185-194.
Ruiz Espinoza, F.H.; B. Murillo Amador; J.L. García Hernández; L. Fenech Larios; E.O. Rueda Puente; E. Troyo Diéguez; C. Kaya and A. Beltrán Morales. 2010. Field evaluation of the relationship between chlorophyll content in basil leaves and a portable chlorophyll meter (SPAD-502) readings. J. Plant Nutr. 33: 423-438.
Santos Nascimento, H. and R.A. Marenco. 2010. SPAD-502 readings in response to photon fluence in leaves with different chlorophyll content. Rev. Ceres 57(5): 614-620.
Silla, F.; A. González-Gil; M.E. González-Molina; S. Mediavilla and A. Escudero. 2010. Estimation of chlorophyll in Quercus leaves using a portable chlorophyll meter: effects of species and leaf age. Ann. For. Sci. 67: 108.
Uddling, J.; J. Gelang-Alfredson; K. Piikki and H. Pleijel. 2007. Evaluating the relationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter readings. Photosynth. Res. 91: 37-46.
van der Berg, A.K. and T.D. Perkins. 2004. Evaluation of a portable chlorophyll meter to estimate chlorophyll and nitrogen contents in sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) leaves. Forest Ecol. Manag. 200: 113-117.
White, J.W. and C. Montes-Rand. 2005. Variation in parameters related to leaf thickness in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field Crops Research 91: 7-21
Wintermans, J.F.G.M. and A. De Mots. 1965. Spectrophotometric characteristics of chlorophylls a and b and their pheophytins in ethanol. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 109: 448-453.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain the copyright and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered through the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 2.5 Argentina License.Authors may do other separate and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.